|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Assessing the Role of Evidence in Patients' Evaluation of Complementary Therapies: A Quality Study
Marja J. Verhoef, PhD
Departments of Community Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, mverhoef{at}ucalgary.ca
Andrea Mulkins, MSc
Tzu Chi Research Group, Vancouver, BC
Linda E. Carlson, PhD
Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre and the Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Robert J. Hilsden, PhD, MD
Departments of Community Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Anna Kania, BSc
Departments of Community Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Background: Making the decision to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for cancer treatment is difficult in light of the limited available evidence for these treatments. It is unclear how patients use evidence to make these decisions. Objectives: (1) Describe the type of information about CAM that cancer patients use in their decision making; (2) understand why certain types of information about CAM are accepted as evidence by cancer patients; and (3) explore the role of scientific evidence in treatment decision making. Methods: A qualitative study design using in-depth semistructured interviews with cancer patients attending 4 conventional and integrative health care institutions in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada, was used. Results: Twenty-seven patients were interviewed. Patients sought CAM information from a range of sources, including the Internet, health care providers, friends, relatives, and newspapers. Many expressed frustration about the overwhelming amount of available information and found it difficult to identify reliable information. Information was described as reliable if it supported them in arriving at a decision about CAM. Types of information participants identified included anecdotes, expert opinion, gut feeling, popular literature, scientific evidence, testimonials, advertising and trial and error. Profound differences were found between new CAM users, experienced CAM users, and users with late-stage cancer in type of information sought, the role of scientific evidence in decision making, and overall information needs. Conclusion: Although this was a relatively small qualitative study, the results suggest that (1) many patients do not value scientific evidence as highly as conventional providers and (2) it is important for clinicians and other information providers to be aware of the different types of information that patients seek out and access when making choices and decisions regarding CAM treatments and why they seek out these sources.
Key Words: complementary and alternative medicine • patient decision making • evidence • assessing information • cancer
References
- National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). CAM Basics: What Is CAM? 2007. www.nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam. Accessed December 15, 2006.
- Leis A., Verhoef M., Deschamps M., Doll R., Tan L., Dewar R. What determines the use of complementary therapies by Canadian cancer patients? Focus Altern Complement Ther. 2003;8:149-150.
- Montbriand MJ Alternative therapies as control behaviours used by cancer patients. J Adv Nurs. 1995;22:646-654.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Truant T., Bottorff JL Decision making related to complementary therapies: a process of regaining control. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38:131-142.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- White MA, Verhoef MJ Decision-making control: why men decline treatment for prostate cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2003; 2:217-224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Boon H., Brown JB, Gavin A., Kennard MA, Stewart M. Breast cancer survivors' perceptions of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM): making the decision to use or not to use. Qual Health Res. 1999;5:639-653.
- Boon H., Brown JB, Gavin A., Westlake K. Men with prostate cancer: making decisions about complementary/alternative medicine. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:471-479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Balneaves L., Bottorff J., Truant T., Davidson B. Information needs of breast and prostate cancer patients using complementary therapies: a pilot study. Can Oncol Nurs. 2005;15:42.
- Kelly-Powell ML Personalizing choices: patients' experiences with making treatment decisions. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20: 219-227.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Montbriand MJ Decision tree model describing alternate health care choices made by oncology patients. Cancer Nurs. 1995;8:104-117.
- Enkin MW, Jadad AR Using anecdotal information in evidence based health care: heresy or necessity? Ann Oncol. 1998;9:963-966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vanderheyden LC, Verhoef MJ, Hilsden R. The role of scientific evidence in the decision to use complementary and alternative medicine. Evid Based Integr Med. 2005;2:19-20.[CrossRef]
- Singh H., Maskarinec G., Shumay DM Understanding the motivation for conventional and complementary/alternative medicine use among men with prostate cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005;4:187-194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS Medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312:71-72.[Free Full Text]
- Borgerson K. Evidence based alternative medicine? Perspect Biol Med. 2005;48:502-515.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Haynes RB What kind of evidence is it that evidence based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:3.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Montori VM, Guyatt GH What is evidence based medicine and why should it be practiced? Respir Care. 2001;46:1201-1214.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Morse J. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res. 1995; 5:147-149.[Free Full Text]
- Miles MB, Huberman AM Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
- Friis LS, Elverdam B., Schmidt KG The patient's perspective: a qualitative study of acute myeloid leukaemia patients' need for information and their information-seeking behaviour. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11:162-170.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W., Haynes BR Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
- Chan JJ, Chan JE Medicine for the millennium: the challenge of postmodernism. eMJA. 2000;172:332-334.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Richardson J. Complementary and alternative medicine: socially constructed or evidence-based? In: Lee-Treweek G, Heller T, Spurr S, MacQueen H, Katz J, eds. Perspectives on Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Reader. New York, NY: Routledge; 2005:26-32.
- Jonas WD The evidence house: how to build an inclusive base for complementary medicine. West J Med. 2001; 175:79-80.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Manning DL, Dickens C. Cancer information and support centres: fixing parts cancer drugs cannot reach. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16:33-36.[CrossRef]
- Astin AJ, Reilly C., Perkins C., Child WL Breast cancer patients' perspectives on and use of complementary and alternative medicine: a study by the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. JSIO. 2006;4:157-169.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pecchioni LL, Sparks L. Health information sources of individuals with cancer and their family members. Health Communication. 2007;21:143-151.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cohen L., Cohen MH, Kirkwood C., Russel NC Discussing complementary therapies in an oncology setting. JSIO. 2007;5:18-24.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 6, No. 4,
345-353 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735407309482
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
