|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 5, No. 1,
30-39 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735405285096
© 2006 SAGE Publications
Diagnostic Accuracy of Canine Scent Detection in Early- and Late-Stage Lung and Breast Cancers
Michael McCulloch
Pine Street Foundation, San Anselmo, California, mcculloch{at}pinestreetfoundation.org
Tadeusz Jezierski
Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Jastrzebiec, Poland
Michael Broffman
Pine Street Foundation, San Anselmo, California
Alan Hubbard
University of California at Berkeley
Kirk Turner
EZ Train, El Sobrante, California
Teresa Janecki
Centerville, Utah
Background: Lung and breast cancers are leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Prior exploratory work has shown that patterns of biochemical markers have been found in the exhaled breath of patients with lung and breast cancers that are distinguishable from those of controls. However, chemical analysis of exhaled breath has not shown suitability for individual clinical diagnosis. Methods: The authors used a food reward-based method of training 5 ordinary household dogs to distinguish, by scent alone, exhaled breath samples of 55 lung and 31 breast cancer patients from those of 83 healthy controls. A correct indication of cancer samples by the dogs was sitting/lying in front of the sample. A correct response to control samples was to ignore the sample. The authors first trained the dogs in a 3-phase sequential process with gradually increasing levels of challenge. Once trained, the dogs’ ability to distinguish cancer patients from controls was then tested using breath samples from subjects not previously encountered by the dogs. The researchers blinded both dog handlers and experimental observers to the identity of breath samples. The diagnostic accuracy data reported were obtained solely from the dogs’ sniffing, in double-blinded conditions, of these breath samples obtained from subjects not previously encountered by the dogs during the training period. Results: Among lung cancer patients and controls, overall sensitivity of canine scent detection compared to biopsy-confirmed conventional diagnosis was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99, 1.00) and overall specificity 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96, 1.00). Among breast cancer patients and controls, sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75, 1.00) and specificity 0.98 (95% CI, 0.90, 0.99). Sensitivity and specificity were remarkably similar across all 4 stages of both diseases. Conclusion: Training was efficient and cancer identification was accurate; in a matter of weeks, ordinary household dogs with only basic behavioral "puppy training" were trained to accurately distinguish breath samples of lung and breast cancer patients from those of controls. This pilot work using canine scent detection demonstrates the validity of using a biological system to examine exhaled breath in the diagnostic identification of lung and breast cancers. Future work should closely examine the chemistry of exhaled breath to identify which chemical compounds can most accurately identify the presence of cancer.
Key Words: dogs • canine scent detection • breast cancer • diagnosis • lung cancer, diagnosis
References
- Fossella FV, Komaki R, Putnam JB. Lung Cancer. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2003.
- Dammas S, Patz EF, Jr, Goodman PC. Identification of small lung nodules at autopsy: implications for lung cancer screening and overdiagnosis bias. Lung Cancer. 2001;33(1):11-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shim, SS, Lee, KS, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging. Radiology. 2005;236(3):1011-1019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Olsen AH, Njor SH, Vejborg I, et al. Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study. BMJ. 2005;330:220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gill PG, Farshid G, Luke CG, Roder DM. Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast. 2004;13:15-22.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Barth RJ, Jr, Gibson GR, Carney PA, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:324-329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet. 2000;355:129-134.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Freedman DA, Petitti DB, Robins JM. On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:43-55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Aro AR, Pilvikki Absetz S, van Elderen TM, van der Ploeg E, van der Kamp LJ. False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress: breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1089-1097.
- Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1432-1440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kennedy TC, Hirsch FR. Using molecular markers in sputum for the early detection of lung cancer: a review. Lung Cancer. 2004;45(suppl 2):S21-S27.
- Hilbe W, Dirnhofer S, Greil R, Woll E. Biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2004;13:425-436.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Coradini D, Daidone MG. Biomolecular prognostic factors in breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16:49-55.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Walker DB, Cavnar P, Taylor J, et al. Canine olfactory thresholds to N-amyl acetate measured naturalistically. Paper presented at: Meeting of the Association for Chemoreception Sciences; April 2003; Sarasota, Fla.
- Walker DB, Walker JC, Cavnar P, et al. Naturalistic Quantification of Canine Olfactory Sensitivity. Forthcoming.
- O’Neill HJ, Gordon SM, O’Neill MH, Gibbons RD, Szidon JP. A computerized classification technique for screening for the presence of breath biomarkers in lung cancer. Clin Chem. 1988;34:1613-1618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Preti G, Labows JN, Kostelc JG, Aldinger S, Daniele R. Analysis of lung air from patients with bronchogenic carcinoma and controls using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr. 1988;432:1-11.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Phillips M, Cataneo RN, Ditkoff BA, et al. Volatile markers of breast cancer in the breath. Breast J. 2003;9:184-191.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gordon SM, Szidon JP, Krotoszynski BK, Gibbons RD, O’Neill HJ. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled air from patients with lung cancer. Clin Chem. 1985;31:1278-1282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Phillips M, Greenberg J. Method for the collection and analysis of volatile compounds in the breath. J Chromatogr. 1991;564:242-249.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Phillips M. Breath tests in medicine. Sci Am. 1992;267(1):74-79.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Phillips M, Gleeson K, Hughes JM, et al. Volatile organic compounds in breath as markers of lung cancer: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 1999;353:1930-1933.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Williams H, Pembroke A. Sniffer dogs in the melanoma clinic? Lancet. 1989;1:734.
- Church J, Williams H. Another sniffer dog for the clinic? Lancet. 2001;358:930.
- Pickel DP, Manucy GP, Walker DB, Hall SB, Walker JC. Evidence for canine olfactory detection of melanoma. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2004;89:107-116.[CrossRef]
- Willis CM, Church SM, Guest CM, et al. Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study. BMJ. 2004;329:712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pryor K. Don’t Shoot the Dog! The New Art of Teaching and Training. Rev ed. New York, NY: Bantam; 1999.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
K. I. Block
An Antioxidant Turnabout
Integr Cancer Ther,
June 1, 2008;
7(2):
59 - 61.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Horvath, G. a. K. Jarverud, S. Jarverud, and I. Horvath
Human Ovarian Carcinomas Detected by Specific Odor
Integr Cancer Ther,
June 1, 2008;
7(2):
76 - 80.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
