This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Elzer, K. L. Articles by Novak, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Elzer, K. L. Articles by Novak, J. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Differential Effects of Serine Proteases on the Migration of Normal and Tumor Cells: Implications for Tumor Microenvironment

Department of Pharmacology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Deborah A. Heitzman

Department of Biology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania

Mitchell I. Chernin

Department of Biology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania

Josef F. Novak

Department of Biology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, novak{at}bucknell.edu

The supporting role of proteases in tumor progression and invasion is well known; however, the use of proteases as therapeutic agents has also been demonstrated. In this article, the authors report on the differential effects of exogenous serine proteases on the motility of tumor and normal cells. The treatment of normal and tumor cells with a single dose of pancreatic serine proteases, trypsin (TR) and chymotrypsin (CH), leads to a concentration-dependent response by cells, first accelerating and then slowing mobility. Tumor cells are 10 to 20 times more sensitive to exogenous TR/CH, suggesting that a single dose of proteases may cause discordant movements of normal and tumor cells within the tumor environment. The inhibitory effects of TR on cell motility are contradicted by thrombin (TH), particularly in the regulation of normal cells' migration. The purpose of this investigation was to ascertain the role of protease-activated receptors (PARs) in terms of normal and tumor cell motility. Duplicate treatments with proteases resulted in diminished mobility of both normal and tumor cells. Repeated application of TR and TH in 1-hour treatment intervals initially desensitizes cell surface PARs. However, cell surface PARs reappear regardless of subsequent protease treatments in both normal and tumor cells. The resensitization process is retarded in tumor cells when compared with normal cells. This is evidenced by lower expression of PARs as well as by their relocalization at the tumor cell surfaces. Under these conditions, normal cells remain responsive to exogenous proteases in terms of cell motility. Exogenous proteases do not modulate motility of repeatedly stimulated tumor cells, and consequently, the migration of tumor cells appears disconnected from the PAR signaling pathways. The use of activating peptides in lieu of the cognate proteases for a given PAR system indicated that proteases may act through additional targets not regulated by PAR signaling. We hypothesize that the divergent migration patterns of normal and tumor cells due to exposure to proteases is in part mediated by PARs. Thus, treatment with exogenous proteases may cause rearrangement of the tumor and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment. Such topographical effects may lead to the inhibition of tumor progression and metastasis development.

Key Words: trypsin • thrombin • protease-activated receptors • cell migration • cancer

Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 7, No. 4, 282-294 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735408327250


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?