This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coulter, I. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Coulter, I. D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Evidence Summaries and Synthesis: Necessary but Insufficient Approach for Determining Clinical Practice of Integrated Medicine?

Clinical Research and Integrative Medicine, Samueli Institute, 2101 East Coast Highway, Suite 300, Corona del Mar, CA 921625 Icoulter{at}siib.org

The heart of evidence-based practice is in fact to be found in the use of evidence gained from systematic reviews or more correctly in the synthesis of evidence from systematic reviews. But just as studies vary in the quality of the design so do systematic reviews, and it is therefore necessary for those wishing to make clinical decisions based on this evidence to evaluate the evidence summaries and synthesis themselves. This article examines the criteria available for evaluating the quality of the evidence summary and synthesis. It provides a set of questions for doing this: who did the review; w hat was the objective of the review; how was the review done? Together these questions allow us to determine the trustworthiness of the review. However, that by itself is insufficient for making clinical decisions. The article suggests that this occurs because the very studies that improve the quality of reviews, that is, the randomized controlled trials, deal with efficacy and not effectiveness. Because they tend to be conducted under ideal conditions, they seldom provide the type of information needed to make a decision vis-à-vis an individual patient. The article suggests that observation studies provide much better information in this regard. The challenge here, however, is to develop standards for judging quality observation studies. In conclusion, systematic reviews and syntheses of evidence are a necessary but an insufficient method for making clinical decisions.

Key Words: systematic reviews • evidence synthesis • clinical practic

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Post-White, E. J. Ladas, and K. M. Kelly Advances in the Use of Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum) Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2007; 6(2): 104 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]