This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Verhoef, M. J. Articles by Vroegindewey, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Verhoef, M. J. Articles by Vroegindewey, A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reasons for and Characteristics Associated With Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, mverhoef{at}ucalgary.ca

Lynda G. Balneaves, PhD

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Heather S. Boon, PhD

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Annette Vroegindewey, BN

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of reasons for and sociodemographic and disease characteristics associated with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in cancer patients. Methods: Eligible studies were identified by searching the following databases: Alt Health Watch, AMED, CINAHL, CancerLit, PremMEDLINE, MEDLINE, Pub-Med, Ingenta, EMBASE, and Health Star, as well as reference lists in review articles. Only English-language articles published between 1994 and 2004 were included. Search terms included CAM and oncology/cancer, decision making and CAM and oncology/cancer, treatment decision making and CAM and oncology/cancer, and health care choices and CAM and oncology/cancer. Results: Fifty-two eligible studies were identified and summarized. These studies were conducted in 14 different countries, with the largest number of studies being completed in the United States (34.6%). A therapeutic response, wanting control, a strong belief in CAM, CAM as a last resort, and finding hope were the most commonly cited reasons for using CAM. Age, socioeconomic status, and gender were the dominant characteristics associated with CAM use. Conclusion: Reasons for and characteristics associated with CAM use among cancer patients have been studied extensively. Future CAM research among cancer patients should focus on identifying decision-making processes and building theoretical decision-making models. These can be used in the development of decisional aids for patients when confronted with the choice to use CAM as part of their cancer treatment.

Key Words: complementary and alternative medicine • decision making • cancer • systematic review

Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 4, No. 4, 274-286 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735405282361


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Eustachi, H. Pajtler, K. Linde, D. Melchart, and W. Weidenhammer Patients of an Interdisciplinary Cancer Treatment Center: Use of, Knowledge About, and Demand for CAM Treatment Options Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2009; 8(1): 56 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Burke, T. Kuo, R. Harvey, and J. Wang An International Comparison of Attitudes Toward Traditional and Modern Medicine in a Chinese and an American Clinic Setting Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., October 7, 2008; (2008) nen065v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Verhoef, L. C. Vanderheyden, and V. Fonnebo A Whole Systems Research Approach to Cancer Care: Why Do We Need It and How Do We Get Started? Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2006; 5(4): 287 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Hann, S. Allen, D. Ciambrone, and A. Shah Use of Complementary Therapies During Chemotherapy: Influence of Patients' Satisfaction With Treatment Decision Making and the Treating Oncologist Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 224 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF]