This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tovey, P. Articles by Ahmad, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tovey, P. Articles by Ahmad, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cancer Cancer Alternative Therapies Complementary and Alternative Medicine Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Patient Assessment of Effectiveness and Satisfaction With Traditional Medicine, Globalized Complementary and Alternative Medicines, and Allopathic Medicines for Cancer in Pakistan

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.; p.a.tovey{at}leeds.ac.uk

Alex Broom, PhD

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.

John Chatwin, PhD

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.

Muhammad Hafeez, PhD

University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

Salma Ahmad, PhD

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.

Background: Virtually no research has been conducted on patient assessments of traditional medicines and allopathic medicines for cancer care in poorer countries marked by pluralistic medical environments. Pakistan represents an excellent case for such a study because of the coexistence of culturally and historically specific indigenous traditional medicine, the strong presence of allopathic medicine, and, to a lesser extent, the availability of some globalized complementary and alternative medicines.Aim:To gain a preliminary understanding of cancer patients' perceptions of effectiveness and satisfaction with traditional medicine, globalized complementary and alternative medicine, and allopathy in the context of a pluralistic medical environment.Study Design:Structured survey of 362 cancer patients, from diverse regions in the Punjab province and Northwest Frontier province, who were being treated in 4 different hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan.Results:Use of traditional medicine remains high among cancer patients, with traditional healers used by the majority of those surveyed. Although patients’ perceptions of the overall effectiveness of traditional medicines for treating cancer are low, those patients who do use traditional medicines still have high levels of satisfaction with these modalities. This is distinct from levels of satisfaction with, and perceptions of effectiveness of, Western cancer treatments, which were synonymous in this group of patients. Important differences in patient perceptions were found within groups (eg, between different forms of traditional healers) as well as between them.Conclusion: This study showed considerable support for complementary and alternative medicine/traditional medicine but also significant variation in usage of and perceptions of local traditional medicines. More research needs to be done to explore the social processes underlying this variation in cancer patients’ preferences for particular traditional medicines.

Key Words: traditional medicine • Pakistan • complementary • medicine • cancer

Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 4, No. 3, 242-248 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735405279600


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?