Integrative Cancer Therapies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 4, No. 3, 210-218 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735405279179

Challenges to Complementary and Alternative Medical Research: Focal Issues Influencing Integration Into a Cancer Care Model

James Giordano, PhD

Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057.; Gsynapse22{at}aol.com

Joan Engebretson, DrPH

School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Mary K. Garcia, DrPH, LAc

Department of Anesthesiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston.

Complementary and alternative therapies are increasingly used by cancer patients for palliative and postcancer preventive and/or wellness care. It is critical that evidence-based models be employed to both provide information for patients' use and informed consent and for physicians to advise patients and assess relative risk:benefit ratios of using specific complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches within the cancer care paradigm. Research models for biomedicine have been somewhat limited when applied to broader, more holistic conceptualizations of health common to many forms of CAM. Thus, while numerous challenges to studying CAM exist, a fundamental question is not just whatCAMpractices should be studied but howCAM should be studied. The authors propose a model that emphasizes methodologic rigor yet approaches CAM research according to relative levels of evidence, meaning, and context, ranging from experimental, quantitative studies of mechanism to qualitative, observational studies of noetic/ salutogenic variables. Responsibility for training researchers prepared to meet such challenges rests on bothCAMand mainstream academic institutions, and care must be taken to avoid philosophical and practical pitfalls that might befall a myopic perspective of integration.

Key Words: complementary medicine • integration • research • paradigms • evidence-based care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
J. I. Rheingans
A Systematic Review of Nonpharmacologic Adjunctive Therapies for Symptom Management in Children With Cancer
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, March 1, 2007; 24(2): 81 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]