SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Integrative Cancer Therapies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Neugut, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Neugut, A. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cancer Outcomes at the Hufeland (Complementary/Alternative Medicine) Klinik: A Best-Case Series Review

Judith S. Jacobson, DrPH, MBA

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons

Victor R. Grann, MD, MPH

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Medicine, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, vrg2{at}columbia.edu

Michael A. Gnatt, MD

Department of Medicine, St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, New York, New York

Hanina Hibshoosh, MD

Department of Pathology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons

John H.M. Austin, MD

Department of Radiology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons

William S. Millar, MD

Department of Radiology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons

Alfred I. Neugut, MD, PhD

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Medicine, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons

Purpose: A best-case series review is an efficient tool with which to screen complex complementary and alternative treatments for cancer as candidates for further study. Study Design: The National Cancer Institute and other agencies have adopted the best-case series method to evaluate cancer treatments involving complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for further study. The authors conducted a best-case series review of the Hufeland Klinik. Established in 1985 in Bad Mergentheim, Germany, this facility treats more than 500 cancer patients per year. Hufeland treatment includes dietary modification, injections, ozone therapy, active fever therapy, psychotherapy, and sometimes hormone therapy and/or low-dose chemotherapy. The goal of the treatment is to prolong survival and to maintain good quality of life. Methods: The clinic provided summaries of 27 cases in which patients with longer than expected survival had agreed to make their medical records available for review. The review involved pathologic confirmation of disease and radiologic confirmation of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) not attributable to conventional treatment. Results: Based on the summaries and an exhaustive 2-year search for medical records, slides, and imaging data, 12 of 27 cases were selected for full review, and 5 (3 CRs and 2 PRs) were judged best cases. Conclusion: Most patients with common cancers receive conventional treatment before coming to Hufeland, and many are treated with chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy while there. Hence, only a few could be considered for review. With 5 of 12 patients showing a treatment response, the authors conclude that the Hufeland treatment merits further study. They also recommend the development of criteria with which to evaluate best-case series reviews of complex CAM treatments for patients with advanced cancer.

Key Words: cancer • best-case series • complementary • alternative • holistic • complete response • partial response • survival

Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 156-167 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735405275796


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
J. Hok, A. Forss, T. Falkenberg, and C. Tishelman
What Is an Exceptional Cancer Trajectory?: Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives on Cancer Trajectories in Relation to Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use
Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2009; 8(2): 153 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
Hwa Seung Yoo, Chong Kwan Cho, and M. S. Hong
Review of the Best Case Series Methodology: Best Case Series Results of East-West Cancer Center
Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2008; 7(3): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]