SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Integrative Cancer Therapies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hann, D.
Right arrow Articles by Entrekin, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hann, D.
Right arrow Articles by Entrekin, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Long-term Breast Cancer Survivors’ Use of Complementary Therapies: Perceived Impact on Recovery and Prevention of Recurrence

Danette Hann, PhD

American Cancer Society Behavioral Research Center, 1599 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 dhann_1{at}yahoo.com.

Frank Baker, PhD

American Cancer Society Behavioral Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia.

Maxine Denniston, MSPH

Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia.

Nina Entrekin, RN, MN

American Cancer Society Florida Division, Tampa.

Objective:Many cancer survivors use some form of complementary therapy (CT); this is particularly true for women with breast cancer. The majority of reports on CT use in women with breast cancer have focused on CT use during cancer treatment or within a year or two of treatment completion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate longertermbreast cancer survivors’ (average, 8.7 years) frequency of CT use and their beliefs about the role of CT in cancer recovery and the prevention of cancer recurrence, as well as the relationship of CT use with current life satisfaction. Methods: A mail survey was completed by 608 breast cancer survivors a minimum of 2 years after their most recent cancer diagnosis. Participants were contacted through the American Cancer Society Reach to Recovery program in Florida. The self-report questionnaire inquired about the use of various CTs, beliefs about CT, current life satisfaction, demographic characteristics, and cancer treatment history.Results: Most of the respondents were older than 50, were Caucasian, were married, had attended or completed college, and were at least 5 years after breast cancer treatment. The most commonly used CTs included exercise, vitamins, prayer/spiritual practice, support groups, humor, self-help books, and relaxation. These survivors used CT therapies because they wanted to play a more active role in their cancer recovery, to manage stress, and to maintain hope. A majority of them reported that they used CT to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Use of CT was not correlated with life satisfaction.Conclusions: Most of the breast cancer survivors in this study had used some form of CT since the time of their most recent cancer diagnosis and believed that such therapies could be of significant benefit, despite a lack of correlation between CT use and current life satisfaction. Many believed that use of CT may prevent cancer recurrence. It is important, therefore, to investigate the efficacy of variousCTs among longer-termcancer survivors, especially with regard to their potential in preventing cancer recurrence.

Key Words: complementary therapy • quality of life • breast cancer • long-term survivors

Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 4, No. 1, 14-20 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735404273723


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. D. Myers, P. B. Jacobsen, Y. Huang, M. H. Frost, C. A. Patten, J. R. Cerhan, and T. A. Sellers
Familial and Perceived Risk of Breast Cancer in Relation to Use of Complementary Medicine
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1527 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
V. S. Eschiti
Lesson From Comparison of CAM Use by Women With Female-Specific Cancers to Others: It's Time to Focus on Interaction Risks With CAM Therapies
Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2007; 6(4): 313 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
M. P. Bennett and C. Lengacher
Humor and Laughter May Influence Health: II. Complementary Therapies and Humor in a Clinical Population
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., June 1, 2006; 3(2): 187 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
K. I. Block
Integrative Physician's Perspective
Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2005; 4(1): 61 - 64.
[PDF]



Advertisement